Audible: In a mood to listen not read
When it comes to approaching life, there are a few different philosophies that people tend to follow. Two of the most popular are logic-based living and values-based living.
Logic-based living is all about using reason and rational thinking to make decisions. This approach is often associated with being practical, efficient, and all about numbers. For example, a person who follows a logic-based approach might choose to take a well-paying job with a big company, even if it doesn't align with their passion, because it makes the most sense financially. Or, a person who follows a logic-based approach might choose to invest their money in a company that is known for exploiting workers, using harmful chemicals, and having a negative impact on the environment, because it is projected to have high returns on investment. Despite knowing the negative consequences of their actions, they may justify their decision by saying that maximizing financial gain is the most rational and logical choice.
On the other hand, values-based living is all about making decisions that align with one's personal values and beliefs, while also considering the impact it has on society and the people around them. This approach is often associated with being true to oneself, living a fulfilling life, and being socially conscious. For example, a person who follows a values-based approach might choose to pursue a career in the arts, even if it doesn't pay as well as a corporate job, because it aligns with their passion and values, and also contributes positively to society and community. Or, a person who follows a values-based approach might choose to turn down a job offer from a big pharmaceutical company that pays well but goes against their personal beliefs and values, and also has a negative impact on society and community, because they want to find a job that aligns with their values and also contributes positively to society, even if it pays less.
Another approach is the middle ground, where the individual try to balance both these methods and come to a decision that aligns with both their values and logical reasoning.
Both of these approaches have their advantages and disadvantages. Logic-based living can be practical, efficient, and all about numbers, but it can also lead to feeling unfulfilled and disconnected from one's true self, and ignoring the negative consequences of our actions on others and the environment. Values-based living, on the other hand, can lead to a more fulfilling and authentic life, but it can also be less practical and efficient.
However, when it comes to society, a logic-based approach can lead to a lack of empathy and a focus on the short-term gain over long-term well-being. This can result in a society that prioritizes profit over people and neglects important social issues. It's important to note that when we talk about "logic-based living," we're not saying that logical thinking is inherently negative. In fact, logical thinking is essential for making informed and rational decisions. However, when logical thinking becomes the sole driving force behind decision-making, and everything is reduced to numbers and statistics, it can lead to a lack of empathy and a disregard for moral and ethical considerations and the impact of our actions on others and the environment.
A logic-based approach to decision-making prioritizes efficiency and practicality over empathy and compassion. This can lead to a focus on the short-term gain over long-term well-being, and a lack of consideration for how our actions impact others and the environment.
As a result, a society that is primarily driven by logic-based living can become increasingly self-centered and individualistic. People may become more focused on their own success and well-being, rather than considering the well-being of their community, society, family, friends and loved ones as a whole. This can lead to a breakdown in social cohesion and a lack of concern for the common good. Moreover, in such a society, the marginalized, vulnerable and oppressed groups often tend to be ignored and their issues not prioritized. Additionally, it can lead to breakdowns in personal relationships, as people become more focused on themselves and less on their loved ones. Families may become more disconnected, friends may drift apart and loved ones may feel neglected.
On the other hand, values-based living can promote a more compassionate and equitable society. It's important to find balance between logical thinking and empathy, compassion and social values. Only then we can create a society that is not only efficient and practical but also compassionate and equitable for all. We need to be aware of how our actions impact others and the environment, and strive to make decisions that align with our values and the well-being of society as a whole.
In conclusion, while both logic-based living and values-based living have their own advantages, it's important to find a balance between the two in order to lead a fulfilled, authentic and practical life. Society can also benefit from the balance, where people's values and logical reasoning are aligned with the society's values and goals for overall well-being and sustainability. It's important to make sure that our decisions are not solely based on logic and practicality, but also take into consideration the impact on others, the environment, family, friends, and loved ones, and the long-term consequences. It's only by finding this balance that we can create a society that is not just efficient and practical, but also compassionate, equitable and sustainable for all, and foster strong relationships with our loved ones.
ollow me on 
Tweet 
Facebook 
Tiktok 
YouTube
Check out my books on Amazon :
The Path to Success: How Parental
Support and Encouragement Can Help Children Thrive
Middle School Mischief:
Challenges and antics that middle school students experience and navigate
Another great topic and thought provoking subject to discuss with families and friends at dinner table.
ReplyDeleteLife should be Logic (another word for common sense) AND Values, not an OR. Values should have logic (and vice versa); otherwise it will not sustain. On the other hand, I can debate Logic/Common Sense vs Faith and yes, balancing act here is what got the human race going.
Another 'VS' topic can be Logical VS Ethical!
Values are personal beliefs or principles that guide an individual's behavior and decision making. They are often rooted in emotions and subjective experiences, rather than in logic or reason. While values can be influenced by logic and reason, they are not always logical in the traditional sense.
ReplyDeleteFor example, an individual might value honesty, even if it's not always the most logical or practical choice. They might choose to be honest in a situation where it could cause them harm, because they believe it is the right thing to do. Similarly, an individual might value environmental conservation, even if it is not logical in terms of maximizing profits or economic growth.
That said, values can be logical in the sense that they can be based on rational arguments or evidence and they can be consistent with the facts and the reality. But, values can also be influenced by emotions, personal experiences, and cultural norms which may not be always logical.
In conclusion, values are personal beliefs that guide our decision making, and they are not always logical in the traditional sense.
Hmm...
ReplyDeleteJust to close loop on it. In big scope of things, wider horizon, no value(s) will sustain without logic; zero. Almost always, values have logic or can be explained. Faith on the other hand is a different discussion:).